Its story runs opposite to the 1st Edition's. Shadowless was printed in far greater volume — roughly 13,000 Shadowless Charizards have been graded against about 5,200 1st Edition ones — yet fewer than half as many exist in gem mint condition: 58 against 125 at PSA 10. More was made, and less survived in perfect shape.
It is also the most mislabelled printing in the hobby, which is why this page exists.
This guide covers the Shadowless printing specifically: why it exists at all, how to tell it apart from the other three printings with certainty, how many were made, which sealed product can still contain it, and where its value actually sits.
Why This Printing Exists
Start with the thing almost nobody explains: Shadowless was not a product anyone planned. Wizards never named it, never marketed it, and has never acknowledged it. Collectors invented the word.
It exists because of how the cards were physically made. The 1st Edition stamp was not part of the card's artwork. It was printed after the rest of the card, from a separate plate loaded into the same press — a detail from Christopher Nitz, Wizards' former Lead Typesetter, via CGC's research. A card face could therefore be printed once and then either stamped or not, with no change to the card itself.
So when Wizards decided the stamped launch run was done, the stamp plate simply stopped being used. What came off the press next was the identical card — same artwork, same fonts, same borders — minus one small black mark.
What it could not do was add the drop shadow, because the shadow was a genuine design change requiring new printing plates, and those plates were not ready. So the unstamped template kept running, into a market where product was selling out within hours of reaching shelves.
That gap was short, and it closed the moment the drop-shadow plates went to press — which is where Unlimited begins. Our best evidence puts Shadowless-era press sheets being signed off in January and February 1999, with the plates prepared as early as December 1998. That is earlier than the “spring 1999” most sources quote. What is genuinely uncertain is the exact start and stop: Wizards published no schedule, and no document has surfaced that fixes it.
We state it as unresolved, because it is. The honest description is that Shadowless is the unstamped continuation of the 1st Edition artwork: one artwork lineage, but demonstrably more than one press event. Anyone telling you this is settled has picked a side.
How to Tell a Shadowless Card
This is the most useful section on the page, because Shadowless is the printing most often identified incorrectly. There are four checks. Run them in this order.
1. The stamp — it is not there
A 1st Edition card carries a small black “Edition 1” stamp, about 5 mm across, left of the artwork. On a Pokémon card it sits beside the species line; on Trainers and Energy it sits lower on the left. No stamp means it is not 1st Edition.
Two cautions. The stamp is the most counterfeited feature in the hobby — a forger turns a modest card into a valuable one by adding a single small mark. And a genuine 1st Edition and a genuine Shadowless differ by exactly that stamp and nothing else, which is why they are confused so often.
2. The drop shadow — it is not there either
Unlimited cards carry a soft grey shadow down the right side of the illustration window, and along the bottom, which makes the art look slightly raised. 1st Edition and Shadowless both have none — the art frame meets the yellow border flat.
Tilt the card under a lamp rather than looking at it flat. The shadow is subtle and reads badly in a dim room or under a camera flash.
The catch: Trainer and Energy cards have no illustration window, so there is no frame to shadow — and they never received the shadow in any printing. On those cards this check cannot be used at all. Use check 3.
3. The copyright line — the one that settles it
This is the most reliable test, and the one that survives wear. Read the tiny copyright text at the bottom of the card:
| Printing | The copyright line reads |
|---|---|
| Shadowless (and 1st Edition) | ©1995, 96, 98, 99 Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK. ©1999 Wizards. |
| Unlimited (1999) | ©1995, 96, 98 Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK. ©1999 Wizards. |
| Unlimited (©1999–2000) | ©1995, 96, 98 Nintendo, Creatures, GAMEFREAK. ©1999–2000 Wizards. |
The tell is the extra “99” in the first run of years, before “Nintendo”. Shadowless has it. Unlimited does not. Both end in ©1999 Wizards — only the ©1999–2000 plate changes that.
On Trainers and Energy cards this is the only test that works, so it is the one to use on the 34 cards in the set that have no artwork window.
4. The font weight — confirmation only
Shadowless and 1st Edition use a thinner, lighter HP number and attack text. Unlimited uses a noticeably bolder one. The difference is real but subtle, and it photographs badly — treat it as confirmation of what the other three checks told you, never as your first move on a blurry listing photo.
Putting it together
| Check | 1st Edition | Shadowless | Unlimited |
|---|---|---|---|
| Edition 1 stamp | Yes | No | No |
| Drop shadow on the art frame | No | No | Yes |
| Extra “99” in the copyright | Yes | Yes | No |
| HP / attack font | Thinner | Thinner | Bolder |
Two Shadowless specifics worth knowing
Red Cheeks Pikachu. Pikachu #58 was printed with red cheeks in the 1st Edition and Shadowless runs only. Every Unlimited Pikachu has yellow cheeks. A Shadowless Red Cheeks Pikachu is therefore a genuine variant rather than a curiosity, and it exists in both a stamped and an unstamped version.
The Ghost Stamp Pikachu. A rare Shadowless Pikachu showing only a hollow outline of “EDITION”, found in the gold-strip Zap! theme deck. Despite the “1st Edition” nickname it carries in older articles, CGC's research confirms it is a Shadowless card — the partial stamp is a press artifact left on the wrong plate, not an actual stamp. It is heavily counterfeited, and CGC's guide is the authentication reference.
Buying online — what to ask for
- A straight-on, high-resolution photo of the area left of the art box, to confirm the absence of the stamp.
- The right edge of the art frame, angled under light, to confirm the absence of the shadow.
- A macro shot of the copyright line — always request this on Trainer and Energy cards, where nothing else works.
- Watch for altered cards. A shadow can be scratched or chemically removed to pass a card off as Shadowless; under magnification that shows up as scratches and ink loss along the frame edge.
How Many Were Actually Printed
We work this the same way as the 1st Edition guide, and the result is the most surprising thing about this printing: Shadowless was printed in far greater numbers than 1st Edition.
The method starts from the graded population and works upward. A Base Set booster pack held 11 cards — one rare, three uncommons, five commons and two energy. The rare slot was holographic about one time in three. Machamp #8 is excluded because it came fixed in the 2-Player Starter Set rather than from packs, leaving 15 pullable holos. That puts any specific holo at roughly one pack in forty-five.
The numbers behind it
| Shadowless holo | PSA graded | PSA 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Charizard #4 | 13,006 | 58 |
| Blastoise #2 | 7,231 | 44 |
| Venusaur #15 | 6,902 | 101 |
| Mewtwo #10 | 6,546 | 75 |
| Gyarados #6 | 6,409 | 61 |
| Hitmonchan #7 | 4,598 | 41 |
| Alakazam #1 | 4,392 | 33 |
| Chansey #3 | 3,560 | 16 |
Take Charizard, the most-graded card that could only come from a pack. 13,006 PSA-graded copies at one per 45 packs means at least ~585,000 packs were opened — and that is a floor, not an estimate, because it counts only copies that have been submitted and does not count a single card still sitting in a binder or a sealed box.
Allowing for ungraded copies and for sealed product still in collections, the printed total lands somewhere around 600,000 to 1,200,000 packs. But the honest headline is the comparison, which holds whatever assumptions you use: Shadowless was printed at somewhere around two to two-and-a-half times the volume of the 1st Edition run.
One caveat we will not hide: the 1-in-45 figure assumes holos were distributed evenly, and the Shadowless holo sheet was not identical to the Unlimited one. Treat the pack total as an order of magnitude, and the ratio to 1st Edition — which is far more robust — as the real finding.
The explanation is not that Shadowless cards were printed worse — the two runs share the same foil, the same cutting blades and the same grade obstacles. It is which cards got submitted. The 1st Edition stamp made grading economically rational at almost any grade for thirty years, so the copies that went in were heavily cherry-picked for quality. Shadowless was “just the unlimited cards” for most of that time: played with, stored loose, submitted in bulk. The result is a printing that is commoner and still harder to find perfect.
What Came in the Products
If you are hunting Shadowless cards in sealed product rather than as singles, the product matters more than the pack art. There is one reliable tell.
The four theme decks
Overgrowth, Zap!, Brushfire and Blackout all shipped at launch, and all can contain Shadowless cards. The one visual feature that guarantees a Shadowless deck is a gold pull-tab strip around the top of the box.
Be precise about what that means: the gold strip guarantees Shadowless, but its absence proves nothing — plenty of Shadowless decks shipped without one. There is no way to confirm a Shadowless deck by appearance in the other direction, which is why openers track box variants.
The 2-Player Starter Set
The first print run of the 2-Player Starter Set shipped before Base Set itself, and every card in it was stamped. In later print runs, only Machamp kept the stamp. So an early Starter Set is a genuine Shadowless source, and a late one is not.
Machamp — the card that breaks the rules
Machamp #8 is the one Base Set holo that never came from a booster pack, and it is also the only card where “stamp plus drop shadow” is completely normal. Every commercially printed Machamp carries the 1st Edition stamp, including shadowed later printings. A Machamp's stamp therefore tells you nothing about its rarity — and it trades around $26 raw despite looking like a grail.
The one true exception is the non-holo Machamp from Trainer Deck A — the only Base Set Machamp with no stamp at all. It is a collector item in its own right, and the reason a careful collector never treats “Machamp” as one card.
The Cards That Actually Matter
Sixteen cards carry essentially all of this set's financial weight, exactly as in 1st Edition. What changes on Shadowless is the proportion — the discount against 1st Edition is enormous on Charizard and trivial on everything else.
| Card | Shadowless raw | Shadowless PSA 10 | Why collectors want it |
|---|---|---|---|
| Charizard #4 | ~$1,015 | ~$30,100 | The flagship, and the reason most people look at this printing at all. Only 58 have ever graded a 10 — fewer than half the 1st Edition count, on more than twice the print run. |
| Blastoise #2 | ~$300 | ~$20,250 | The rarest gem in the whole Base Set at 44 copies. Genuinely harder to find perfect than any 1st Edition Blastoise. |
| Venusaur #15 | ~$212 | ~$7,699 | Completes the starter trio, and the easiest of the three to find well-centred. |
| Chansey #3 | ~$50 | ~$4,355 | Its huge holofoil area makes centring brutal — only 16 gems exist, the lowest figure in the set. |
| Alakazam #1 | ~$131 | ~$12,692 | Card #1, plus a striking Arita illustration. |
| Mewtwo #10 | ~$92 | ~$13,144 | The other iconic character of the era, and a fixed holo in the Zap! theme deck. |
| Gyarados #6 | ~$70 | ~$4,323 | Iconic art and the Magikarp payoff; the fixed holo in Overgrowth. |
| Raichu #14 | ~$75 | ~$3,733 | Pikachu's evolution, carrying Pikachu's popularity into a holo. |
| Zapdos #16 | ~$61 | ~$4,051 | The legendary bird, and a competitive staple of 1999. |
| Ninetales #12 | ~$43 | ~$2,047 | Beautiful art, and the source of the famous “no damage” error. |
| Hitmonchan #7 | ~$26 | ~$3,939 | A cornerstone of the 1999 “Haymaker” deck, which gives it competitive-history demand. |
| Pikachu #58 | ~$20 | ~$1,172 | Not a holo — but the Red Cheeks artwork exists only in this printing and 1st Edition, which makes it the set's most collected common. |
Raw near-mint and PSA 10 sold-comp reads from PriceCharting, 2026-09-21. Populations from PriceCharting's PSA census, 2026-09-21. Card markets move; re-check before you transact.
But there is one Pikachu exception, and it is the best-value card on this page: Red Cheeks Pikachu. The red-cheeked artwork exists only in the 1st Edition and Shadowless runs, and on Shadowless the red-versus-yellow price gap is far smaller than it is on 1st Edition. That makes an unstamped Red Cheeks Pikachu one of the few places a collector can own a genuine variant of real significance without paying a branded price.
Why It Holds Value
- It is the 1st Edition artwork. Same illustration, same borders, same thin fonts, same copyright line — the card changed by one small stamp. Collectors who want the early look and cannot fund the stamped tier land here, and it is the last stop before the drop shadow appears.
- The supply is fixed and cannot grow. Very little Shadowless sealed product survives, and unopened product only ever gets opened. There is no reprint path.
- Its gem scarcity is real, and it is not a marketing story. The low PSA 10 populations are a documented consequence of how the printing was treated for thirty years. Blastoise at 44 gems and Chansey at 16 are the hardest Base Set gems to obtain in any printing.
- The grading economics actually work. On a Shadowless holo an 8 or a 9 is worth well more than raw, so grading is rational rather than a coin flip — which keeps certified supply moving and supports the market.
- It is the affordable half of the earliest Base Set. On Charizard, Shadowless runs roughly a tenth of 1st Edition. That gap is what makes it a genuine entry point rather than a consolation prize.
Questions Collectors Ask
Is Shadowless rarer than 1st Edition?
It depends which rarer you mean, and this is the question people get wrong most often. On print volume, no — Shadowless was printed at roughly two to two-and-a-half times the 1st Edition run, and about 13,000 Shadowless Charizards have been graded against about 5,200 1st Edition ones. On gem mint condition, yes — 58 Shadowless Charizard PSA 10s exist against 125 1st Edition ones. So it is the commoner card and the rarer gem. You will find guides claiming Shadowless is simply “rarer”, usually by comparing the wrong two numbers.
How do I tell if my card is Shadowless?
Three checks, in order. It has no 1st Edition stamp left of the artwork. It has no drop shadow down the right side of the art frame. And the copyright line reads ©1995, 96, 98, 99 — the extra “99” is the test that survives wear, and the only test that works on Trainer and Energy cards. If all three hold, it is Shadowless.
What is the difference between Shadowless and 1st Edition?
One stamp, and nothing else. They share the artwork, the borders, the thin font and the identical copyright line. Every 1st Edition Base Set card is also Shadowless; most Shadowless cards carry no stamp. That single mark is the difference between roughly $1,015 and roughly $9,000 on a raw Charizard — which is why sellers quietly describe Shadowless as “1st Edition Shadowless”, a phrase that is technically redundant and often used to inflate a price.
Are there Shadowless Energy cards?
Yes — and you will read the opposite on some collector sites, which claim Basic Energy skipped the Shadowless print entirely. That claim is wrong. Shadowless versions of the Basic Energy cards exist, they carry the same ©1995, 96, 98, 99 copyright line as the rest of the printing, and they have real graded populations. Because Energy cards have no artwork window, the copyright line is the only way to identify them — which is likely how the myth started.
Which sealed product can still contain Shadowless cards?
The four launch theme decks — Overgrowth, Zap!, Brushfire and Blackout — and early 2-Player Starter Sets. On theme decks a gold pull-tab strip around the top of the box guarantees Shadowless, though many Shadowless decks shipped without one, so its absence proves nothing. With Starter Sets it is the opposite: early runs are fully stamped and later runs stamp only Machamp, so an early box is the Shadowless source.
Does Shadowless only exist in English?
Yes. The Shadowless printing was exclusive to the English Base Set. Every other language — French, German, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese and the rest — went straight from 1st Edition to Unlimited with the drop shadow already in place. If you see a “Shadowless” card in another language, it is mislabelled.
Keep going
The 1st Edition guide covers the stamped run this printing came from, and the counterfeit guide covers stamp and shadow tampering.
Card prices are single-point PriceCharting sold-comp reads taken 2026-09-21 (raw near-mint and PSA 10). Population figures are PriceCharting's PSA census read on the same date and move monthly. Print volumes are a reconstruction from the documented pack specification, the era holo pull rate and the graded censuses — not manufacturer data, which does not exist. Where collectors genuinely disagree — the exact print window, and whether 1st Edition and Shadowless were one press run or two — we have said so rather than picking a side.