Reviewed by Caleb Stapel · Collector · Updated September 2026
1st Edition · Base Set 1999 · Arcanine #23/102
Arcanine is the clearest surviving artefact of the franchise’s most persistent misreading: the Pokédex category printed for it reads “Legendary”, while the games treat it as an ordinary Fire Stone evolution that can be bred like any other. The Base Set card carries the older Red and Blue wording.
This page covers the 1st Edition printing specifically — the stamped, shadowless-stock version from the original January 1999 run. If you are unsure which of the Base Set Arcanine printings you own, the 3-second test below settles it before you read any further.
| Grade | Market Price | Share of graded copies |
|---|---|---|
| Ungraded (raw) | $99 | — |
| PSA 7 (NM) | $164 | 12.0% |
| PSA 8 (NM-MT) | $232 | 20.4% |
| PSA 9 (Mint) | $382 | 34.6% |
| PSA 10 (Gem Mint) | $2,500 | 15.4% |
| Grade 6 or below | — | 17.6% |
Prices and population shares: the Cards Worth Chasing ranking, PSA only, September 2026. Shares are of all PSA-graded copies of this card, so they sum to 100% with the grade-6-and-below row. Grading cost basis $59.99 (PSA Standard). Comps move — verify current sold prices before transacting.
What the card is actually being offered for right now. Every listing below is filtered to the genuine 1st Edition card — no repacks, mystery slabs, card skins, or multi-card lots. These are asking prices, not sold comps, so treat them as the top of the market rather than what copies are changing hands for. Buying through these links supports the site at no extra cost to you.
Loading current listings…
Most people who say “I have a 1st Edition Arcanine” don’t. Retail packs in 1999–2000 were overwhelmingly Unlimited printing — and that’s fine, it’s the same iconic card. The fast check, in order:
Arcanine is a Stage 1 Fire with 100 HP, evolving from Growlithe, illustrated by Ken Sugimori. Fire-type uncommons from this run often show surface scuffing; centering is usually the stronger variable than corners.
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
Click to enlarge
PSA 8 prices from PriceCharting sold-comp data, September 2026. Unlimited and 4th Print look nearly identical — the copyright year is the difference. Each printing is its own card with its own price and history; see every printing: 1st Edition · Shadowless · Unlimited · 4th Print.
Arcanine is card 23/102 in the 1999 English Base Set, listed as an Uncommon non-holo card that evolves from Growlithe. The printing in scope is the 1st Edition, marked by a black “Edition 1” stamp at the lower left of the artwork combined with shadowless stock — no drop shadow down the right edge of the art box. The artist is Ken Sugimori.
The card is where the franchise’s most persistent misreading lives. Arcanine is the only Pokémon whose Pokédex category reads “Legendary”, and the games’ mechanical legendaries are a different thing entirely: it evolves from Growlithe by Fire Stone and it can be bred. The description printed on the card itself is the older Red and Blue wording, about beauty and running as if on wings — the card does not carry the “A legendary Pokémon in China” line, which belongs to a later game. The anime then placed an Arcanine on a stone tablet beside the three legendary birds, which sealed the reading for a generation.
The Base Set artwork did not stay exclusive to the first set. Wizards reprinted it in Base Set 2 at 33/130 in 2000 and Legendary Collection at 36/110 in 2002, the latter adding a reverse holo finish. Rarity stayed Uncommon in all three printings and the Sugimori illustration carried over unchanged, so a collector chasing this card is really chasing the printing rather than the picture. Only the 1999 Base Set run has a 1st Edition stamp.
That stamp belongs to a short window, roughly the January 1999 launch into early spring. Wizards never published production figures, so estimates rest on grading populations rather than factory records, and the stamps themselves vary: thick and thin impressions, and low-ink grey stamps, are all found across the run.
Start with the two numbers that describe the whole card: roughly 2,011 graded copies exist in PSA, and about 310 of those are PSA 10s. That is a gem rate near 15.4% — and the gem rate, not the raw population, is the number a collector should actually read. High-grade supply is what the market pays for.
| Card | PSA 10s | Total graded | Gem rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1st Edition Arcanine (1999) | ~310 | ~2,011 | 15.4% |
| Charizard ex #199, S&V 151 (2023) | 29,679 | 102,490 | ~29% |
PriceCharting population data, September 2026. The modern row is a combined PSA + CGC count; the 1999 row is PSA, the way it is normally quoted.
For scale, compare it with the modern equivalent: a comparable modern chase card carries a gem rate near 29%. Modern cards grade far better than vintage ones — not because they are better cards, but because a 1999 card was printed before grading was mainstream and then spent two decades in a binder. A vintage gem count is not comparable to a modern one.
Arcanine’s graded population is mid-sized for a card at the bottom of the price range — the kind of ratio that makes clean high grades disproportionately interesting against the raw cost.
Population source: PriceCharting, September 2026, PSA column only. Two caveats stay attached to every population figure on this site. Graded counts are submission tallies, not unique cards — resubmissions inflate the total, so the number of genuinely distinct gem copies is lower. And the census is a floor, not a final number: it grows with every submission wave.
No error is documented for the English 1st Edition Arcanine itself. Bulbapedia’s error inventory, PSA’s Pokémon Error Guide, the PokéBeach error database and Elite Fourum’s English Base Set master misprint guide all catalogue Base Set errors at length, and none carries an Arcanine 23/102 entry.
Two misprints are routinely attached to the name Arcanine, and both belong to other printings. The first is a misspelled name on the Japanese Expansion Pack printing, not the English 1st Edition. The second is a repeating ink error recorded against a differently named later card, Light Arcanine, from a subsequent set. One 1st Edition variance is worth knowing, though it is set-wide rather than an Arcanine fault: Bulbapedia records low-ink grey-stamp 1st Editions across Base Set commons and uncommons, so this card can carry one without being individually catalogued.
Arcanine is collected because it holds a piece of franchise lore no other card does:
The 1st Edition printing hub explains the stamp, and the Base Set hub shows how Arcanine sits against the eleven high-HP cards in the set.
Ken Sugimori is one of the illustrators who defined the look of the original English Pokémon TCG, and Arcanine is one of their Base Set contributions. This section will carry their full numbers when the artist guide lands — how many cards they illustrated across the Wizards era and what one raw copy of each would cost.
Arcanine is the lore card of this block: the single clearest artefact of a misreading the franchise never corrected, on a card that reuses one illustration across three printings and is priced at the bottom of the set.
Is my 1st Edition Arcanine real or fake?
The 1999 Base Set cards are the most counterfeited in the hobby, and for a raw copy worth real money you cannot settle it from a photo. The checks that catch most fakes: the light test (a genuine card is essentially opaque — a faint dark core line between the layers; cheap fakes glow through), the stamp rule (a real 1st Edition stamp is crisp and sits under the ink, and counterfeiters add stamps to Unlimited cards — read it with the drop shadow and the 1995-99 copyright line, never alone), and the back (fakes perfect the front and neglect the Poké Ball, the blue tone and the repeated text). Above a few hundred dollars, a raw copy should get professional pre-authentication. The full fake-detection walkthrough covers all of it.
Should I grade this card?
The population is mid-sized and the raw cost is low, so the fee dominates the arithmetic. Grade it for the collection; the return is thin. See Should You Grade Pokémon Cards? for the fee maths, and check a raw copy with the CardGrader scanner before sending it in.